This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered Russian forces not to strike Kyiv for three days as U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner travel between Moscow and the Ukrainian capital in an attempt to revive diplomacy over the war.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the pause would begin at midnight on Saturday and was connected specifically to preparations for the American delegation’s visit to Kyiv. Witkoff and Kushner arrived in Moscow on Saturday and are expected to meet Putin in the Kremlin before traveling to Kyiv on Sunday. Ukraine has separately confirmed the itinerary.

The distinction matters: Moscow has announced a temporary suspension of strikes on Kyiv, not a nationwide ceasefire and not an agreement to stop fighting along the front.

A diplomatic window after a sharp escalation

The visit comes after a sharp increase in long-range attacks.

Kyiv has endured ten consecutive days of heavy Russian strikes, with attacks increasingly taking place during daylight as well as at night. On Friday, a Russian drone struck the headquarters of Ukraine’s Security Service, the SBU, in the capital.

Reuters has described the broader change in tactics as a major disruption to daily life in Kyiv, where high-speed drones have made air attacks more persistent and difficult to intercept.

Before the trip, Washington had been seeking security commitments from both sides to reduce the danger to the American delegation. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine was prepared to halt its own airstrikes during the envoys’ visit and called on Russia to do the same.

What Washington is trying to restart

President Donald Trump said the United States has a new “concrete proposal” aimed at ending the war, although he has not publicly disclosed its terms.

Witkoff has repeatedly traveled to Moscow as one of Trump’s principal negotiators on Ukraine, while Kushner has also participated in previous contacts with Putin. Their planned Kyiv visit is significant because the pair have negotiated extensively with Moscow but have not visited Ukraine in this role.

That makes the sequence of this trip important: Washington is speaking directly with Moscow and Kyiv within roughly the same diplomatic window, rather than allowing proposals to move slowly between the two capitals through separate channels.

But proximity does not mean convergence.

The central disagreement has not changed

Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on the most important conditions for ending the war.

The Kremlin reiterated on Friday that Putin’s position remains unchanged: Moscow continues to demand that Ukraine cede the full territory of four Ukrainian regions claimed by Russia and abandon its ambition to join NATO.

Ukraine rejects ceding territory it continues to defend and considers such terms unacceptable.

Reuters also reported that a source close to the Kremlin said Putin still intends to capture more Ukrainian territory, particularly the remaining Ukrainian-held part of Donetsk region. Western military analysts cited by Reuters consider Moscow’s ability to achieve that objective by the end of the year doubtful given the slow rate of Russian advances.

Why the 72-hour pause matters

The strategic significance of the pause extends beyond whether Kyiv experiences three quieter days.

It is whether the temporary restraint produces anything that survives after the American delegation leaves.

The pause creates a limited test of three things: whether Moscow and Kyiv can maintain reciprocal restraint for diplomatic purposes, whether Washington can move the two sides toward concrete negotiations, and whether the U.S. proposal addresses the territorial and security questions that have repeatedly prevented previous initiatives from advancing.

For now, there is no evidence that Russia has changed its stated negotiating demands, that Ukraine has accepted them, or that the two governments have agreed to a broader cessation of hostilities.

It is better understood as a 72-hour diplomatic window inside a war that has recently been intensifying rather than winding down.

What to watch next

The first signal will come from Putin’s talks with Witkoff and Kushner in Moscow. The second will come when the same U.S. envoys meet the Ukrainian leadership in Kyiv.

The critical question is whether Washington emerges from those meetings with a proposal that both sides are actually prepared to negotiate. Otherwise, the initiative could again collide with incompatible positions over Ukrainian territory, security guarantees and the future relationship between Ukraine and NATO.

And beyond the diplomatic language, there will be a simpler test: what happens when the 72 hours end.

Sources: Reuters; Associated Press; Office of the President of Ukraine.